[Python-Dev] Close PEP 211? (was Re: Infix operators)

Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Thu Jul 24 05:26:23 CEST 2008

Terry Reedy wrote:

> Given that itertools.product(A,B) == ((x,y) for x in A for y in B)
> == the proposed 'A @ B' and given Guido's pronounced distaste for new 
> infix, should this be closed?

Would there likely be any support for an alternative
PEP defining @ as matrix multiplication in both Python
and numpy?


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list