[Python-Dev] PEP 371: Additional Discussion
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu Jun 5 15:53:51 CEST 2008
Jesse Noller wrote:
> However, the flip side of this is that no one really "likes" the
> threading API as-is, so putting the module into the standard library
> with the matching API simply adds another "broken" API.
Provided threading gets a PEP 8 style API in 2.6 (which it looks like it
is going to), then I don't see a problem with multiprocessing only
providing the new API.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list