[Python-Dev] C API for gc.enable() and gc.disable()
Aahz
aahz at pythoncraft.com
Sat Jun 21 18:17:42 CEST 2008
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008, "Martin v. L??wis" wrote:
>
> In general, any solution of the "do GC less often" needs to deal with
> cases where lots of garbage gets produced in a short amount of time
> (e.g. in a tight loop), and which run out of memory when GC is done less
> often.
>
> Given the choice of "run slower" and "run out of memory", Python should
> always prefer the former.
I'm not sure I agree with this. GC IIRC was introduced primarily to
alleviate *long-term* memory starvation. You are now IMO adding a new
goal for GC that has not been previously articulated. I believe this
requires consensus rather than a simple declaration of principle.
Guido's opinion if he has one obviously overrules. ;-) Guido?
--
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"as long as we like the same operating system, things are cool." --piranha
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list