[Python-Dev] Undocumenting test.support in 3.x (was Py3k DeprecationWarning in stdlib)
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Fri Jun 27 13:00:35 CEST 2008
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm personally fine with that approach, but some of the new items in there
>>> for 2.6 could probably use a bit of cleaning up to improve the APIs and/or
>>> the way they work.
>> So get crackin'!
>
> I'll add to my list. :)
>
> Anyway, if we are going to make test.support public for real why don't
> we take Nick's suggestion to rename the test package to _test, but
> move test.support to a toplevel position like testutils or such.
Leaving the actual test modules undocumented (which is the situation
now) is fine in my opinion. The _test idea was just for if we wanted to
document test_support for our own benefit without promising to keep it
stable for later releases.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list