[Python-Dev] Improved thread switching
rhamph at gmail.com
Wed Mar 19 17:24:21 CET 2008
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Stefan Ring <s.r at visotech.at> wrote:
> Adam Olsen <rhamph <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > Can you try with a call to sched_yield(), rather than nanosleep()? It
> > should have the same benefit but without as much performance hit.
> > If it works, but is still too much hit, try tuning the checkinterval
> > to see if you can find an acceptable throughput/responsiveness
> > balance.
> I tried that, and it had no effect whatsoever. I suppose it would make an effect
> on a single CPU or an otherwise heavily loaded SMP system but that's not the
> secnario we care about.
So you've got a lightly loaded SMP system? Multiple threads all
blocked on the GIL, multiple CPUs to run them, but only one CPU is
active? I that case I can imagine how sched_yield() might finish
before the other CPUs wake up a thread.
A FIFO scheduler would be the right thing here, but it's only a short
term solution. Care for a long term solution? ;)
Adam Olsen, aka Rhamphoryncus
More information about the Python-Dev