[Python-Dev] Problems with the new super()
Facundo Batista
facundobatista at gmail.com
Thu May 1 21:38:56 CEST 2008
2008/5/1, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net>:
> There may be more implications and surprising behavior surrounding this.
>
> I know that the implementation is a compromise, but I'd rather see a
> super()
> whose full semantics can be explained to programmers without using to
> "cell variable", "f_localsplus" and "symtable".
In consideration of what's been said about super() in the past, and
what is handled here regarding its Py3 implementation, I want to make
a step back, and ask:
Has super() proved more useful than harmful? Which is the value for
Py3 to keep it?
Regards,
--
. Facundo
Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/
PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list