[Python-Dev] Optimization of Python ASTs: How should we deal with constant values?
Jeremy Hylton
jeremy at alum.mit.edu
Tue May 6 17:39:21 CEST 2008
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:38 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> Thomas Lee wrote:
> > Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> >>> This leaves us with a few options:
> >>>
> >>
> >> 5. Reuse/Abuse Num(object) for arbitrary constants.
> >> AFAICT, this should work out of the box.
> >>
> >>
> > Eek. It *does* seem like Num would work out of the box, but would this
> > be a good idea?
>
> No. I suggested it just for completeness.
>
>
> > What about *replacing* Num with Const? Might make optimizations
> > specifically for numeric values slightly hairier, and semantically I
> > think they might be different enough to warrant separate AST nodes
> > despite the similarity in implementation at the compiler level.
>
> I think they should be separate. Const would be a mere addition;
> for compatibility with other uses of the AST, that's actually better
> than simultaneous removal of Num.
Adding Const sounds good to me.
Jeremy
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jeremy%40alum.mit.edu
>
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list