[Python-Dev] Optionally using GMP to implement long if available
thomas at python.org
Tue Nov 4 02:03:15 CET 2008
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 01:37, <skip at pobox.com> wrote:
> Benjamin> The main objection is that GMP is licensed under LGPL which I
> Benjamin> believe conflicts with Python's very open license.
> >> If GMP itself isn't included with Python how can there be a licensing
> >> issue?
> Martin> On Windows, the GMP binaries would be incorporated into
> Martin> pythonxy.dll. This would force anybody providing a copy of
> Martin> pythonxy.dll to also provide the sources of GMP.
> As I understand it the proposal was to allow people to substitute GMP for
> Python's long implementation. Just deliver binaries with the Python long
> version if you don't want to distribute the GMP source. OTOH, it should be
> no big deal to drop a zip archive of the GMP sources which correspond to
> code bound into the DLL. OTOOH, doesn't Windows support dynamic linking?
> Can't pythonxy.dll dynamically link to a gmpMN.dll?
Neither of those (shipping sources or dynamically linking to GMP) would
solve the LGPL issue. People who distribute that build of Python would still
be held by the LGPL -- such as shipping any sources that they embed that
Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-Dev