[Python-Dev] c99 comments in the 2.6 code base?
skip at pobox.com
skip at pobox.com
Fri Oct 3 02:40:20 CEST 2008
>>>> shouldn't we use a suitable gcc option for the buildbots to prevent
>>>> that from happening?
>>>
>>> Which one specifically?
>>
>> I suggest we add "-std=c89" to CFLAGS.
Martin> That needs thorough testing, in particular across many old Linux
Martin> distributions. It might be that some sets of Linux header files
Martin> rely on GNU C extensions, without using the __extension__
Martin> keyword.
Surely we don't need to be that careful with the buildbots do we? If
anything, I think it would be a good idea to be more strict for them than
the default.
Skip
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list