[Python-Dev] decorator module in stdlib?
P.J. Eby
pje at telecommunity.com
Wed Apr 8 20:41:13 CEST 2009
At 10:51 AM 4/8/2009 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>I would like it even less if an API cared about the
>*actual* signature of a function I pass into it.
One notable use of callable argument inspection is Bobo, the
12-years-ago predecessor to Zope, which used argument information to
determine form or query string parameter names. (Were Bobo being
written for the first time today for Python 3, I imagine it would use
argument annotations to specify types, instead of requiring them to
be in the client-side field names.)
Bobo, of course, is just a single case of the general pattern of
tools that expose a callable to some other (possibly
explicitly-typed) system. E.g., wrapping Python functions for
exposure to C, Java, .NET, CORBA, SOAP, etc.
Anyway, it's nice for decorators to be transparent to inspection when
the decorator doesn't actually modify the calling signature, so that
you can then use your decorated functions with tools like the above.
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list