[Python-Dev] Mercurial migration: help needed
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sat Aug 22 06:46:43 CEST 2009
Mark Hammond writes:
> Something like ~/.hgrules having:
Surely you mean $PROJECTROOT/.hgrules?
> [config] # or maybe [rules] ?
> required_extensions = win32text, some_pydev_specific_extension
[extensions]
required_for_commit = win32text,some_other_ext
That might require a change to hg's ini file semantics if currently it
refuses to parse [extension] sections in versioned hgrcs.
Note the change in name: I'm not sure exactly what the semantics
should be, but surely we want to allow browsing the repository,
branching, etc without enabling any extensions.
> [Encode]
> {rules for encoding}
No, there must be a way to indicate that "this is a section for a
specific extension". Bare [Encode] will be seen as polluting the
global namespace, and will get a lot of pushback, I think.
> This way you aren't *enabling* extensions in this versioned file,
True, but how many people will just download the extension and enable
it? This would open a door to "social engineering". (Personally, *I*
am not opposed to it on those grounds, but as devil's advocate I do
want to mention that as an argument you might run into.)
> just listing rules about what extensions must be enabled. From
> core hg's POV, it doesn't care if the required extensions relate to
> windows line endings or re-encoding images - it just honours the
> wishes of the repo owner.
If it refuses the user's request, it should issue a message to the
effect of "Please enable win32text, which is required in <absolute
name of .hgrules>."
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list