[Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 386 for addition

Darren Dale dsdale24 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 10 13:40:06 CET 2009


On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:24 AM, ssteinerX at gmail.com
<ssteinerx at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 10, 2009, at 3:44 AM, Malthe Borch wrote:
>
>> On 12/8/09 6:16 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>> I believe that the current situation is as close to consensus as we
>>> will get on distutils-sig, and in the interests of avoiding months of
>>> further discussion which won't take things any further, I propose to
>>> allow final comments from python-dev and then look for a final
>>> decision.
>>
>> Great work, Tarek. I think you've managed to establish a good body of knowledge on this and the proposal seems sound.
>>
>> That said, I think the terms ``LooseVersion`` and ``StrictVersion`` are less than optimal. Really, what's meant is ``LexicalVersion`` and ``ChronologicalVersion`` (or ``NumberedVersion``). It's not about strictness or looseness.
>
> I agree about the impreciseness of these terms.  I'm not sure what the correct terminology is...

Those aren't new proposals, though, they already exist in distutils.

Darren


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list