[Python-Dev] "Absolute" paths in PEP 376 RECORD files
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu Jul 9 10:50:12 CEST 2009
P.J. Eby wrote:
>> Also,
>> why should the RECORD file be generated at all by bdist* commands?
>
> bdist commands that use "install --root" will get it as a side effect,
> so they don't have to do anything special. They needn't even generate
> the PREFIXES, if PREFIXES is also generated by "install --root", and
> omits the root from the prefixes written. In other words, most bdist
> tools wouldn't change. bdist_wininst and bdist_msi might need to
> regenerate PREFIXES at actual installation time, but AFAIK those are the
> only ones. (And the spec would allow for the possibility that a
> PREFIXES file can be incorrect.)
I haven't seen any suggestions for handling non-relative paths that are
cleaner than this. The distutils based list that Tarek posted also gives
a good "starter set" of supported entries in the PREFIXES file:
PURELIB=<path>
PLATLIB=<path>
HEADERS=<path>
SCRIPTS=<path>
DATA=<path>
The question then would be whether relative paths should be handled
directly in the RECORD file (as in the current PEP) or by writing a "."
into PREFIXES to indicate relative paths.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list