[Python-Dev] draft pep: backwards compatibility

[Aahz]

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2009/6/19 Aahz <aahz at pythoncraft.com>:
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009, Georg Brandl wrote:
>>>
>>> Yet another rather pointless bikeshed: if this becomes policy, maybe it
>>> should get a PEP number < 100, like PEP 5 or 6.
>>
>> +1 -- I was debating whether to say something.
> 
> Is that a +1 to numbering or bike shedding?

+1 to changing the PEP number
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"as long as we like the same operating system, things are cool." --piranha