[Python-Dev] PEP 382: Namespace Packages
P.J. Eby
pje at telecommunity.com
Fri May 1 20:49:40 CEST 2009
At 05:35 PM 5/1/2009 +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
>P.J. Eby wrote:
>>It's unclear, however, who is using base packages besides mx.* and
>>ll.*, although I'd guess from the PyPI listings that perhaps Django
>>is. (It seems that "base" packages are more likely to use a
>>'base-extension' naming pattern, vs. the 'namespace.project'
>>pattern used by "pure" packages.)
>
>I'll stress it again in case you missed it the first time: I think
>the main reason people use "pure namespace" versus "base namespace"
>packages is because hardly anyone know how to do the latter, not
>because there is no desire to do so!
I didn't say there's *no* desire, however IIRC the only person who
*ever* asked on distutils-sig how to do a base package with
setuptools was the author of the ll.* packages. And in the case of
at least the zope.* peak.* and osaf.* namespace packages it was
specifically *not* the intention to have a base __init__.
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list