[Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line?
Georg Brandl
g.brandl at gmx.net
Tue Nov 3 18:44:58 CET 2009
Raymond Hettinger schrieb:
> [Michael Foord]
>> What will it take to *start* the port? (Or is it already underway?) For
>> many projects I fear that it is only the impending obsolescence (real
>> rather than theoretical) of Python 2 that will convince projects to port.
>
> FWIW, I do not buy into the several premises that have arisen in this thread:
>
>
> * For 3.x to succeed, something bad has to happen to 2.x. (which in my book
> translates to intentionally harming 2.x users, either through neglect or
> force, in order to bait them into switching to 3.x).
>
> * Core developers will are losing time supporting 2.x. (backports take some
> time but it is small in comparison to getting a patch to work in the first
> place -- if anyone can comment on this assertion, it is the people who have
> been doing it already (such as AP, MD, BP, GB, and myself)).
I agree. However I wouldn't want to lose the amount of work I've put into 2.7.
While reviewing the 2.6 "svnmerge avail" output, I also got the impression that
a *significant* number of fixes were not backported to 2.6. I don't have the
time to go through a 300+ kb change log and find out what to backport, just
based on commit messages that are not always clear on whether a fix or feature
was added.
So if we kill 2.7, we at least need to make sure no real improvements that
should have been in 2.x are lost.
Georg
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list