[Python-Dev] PEP 3003 - Python Language Moratorium
Steven D'Aprano
steve at pearwood.info
Mon Nov 9 00:06:25 CET 2009
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 11:14:59 am Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> At the very least, I believe, any moratorium should have a clear end
> date. A clear end date will be a powerful counter to the impression
> that Python the language is moribund. It says, this is an exceptional
> pause, not a permanent halt.
Proposal:
No new language features in odd-numbered point releases (3.3, 3.5, ...).
Even-numbered point releases (3.4, 3.6, ...) may include new language
features provided they meet the usual standards for new features.
3.2 is a special case: as an even-numbered release, it would normally
allow new features, but in recognition of the special nature of the 2.x
to 3.1/3.2 migration, no new language features will be allowed.
Advantages:
* It slows down changes to the language while still allowing
sufficiently high-standard new features.
* Alternate implementations have a stable language version to aim for.
Assuming point releases come ever 12-18 months, that stable language
version will last 2-3 years.
* It doesn't have the psychological baggage of an unconditional ban on
new features for the indefinite future. It gives a fixed, known
schedule for when new features will be permitted, without the
uncertainty of "at the BDFL's pleasure".
--
Steven D'Aprano
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list