[Python-Dev] Replacing IDLE

Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Wed Nov 11 08:01:38 CET 2009

Martin v. Löwis wrote:

> If that imaginary editor has lots of build dependencies that make
> it really difficult to use it, I would be opposed to including it.
> If it requires one library that is typically already available on
> a Linux system, it would be fine with me.

If I manage to get PyGUI into a practically usable
state and it ever gets included in the core distribution,
then it might be a viable basis for a modernised version
of IDLE. That's probably a fairly long way off, though.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list