[Python-Dev] buildtime vs runtime in Distutils
tseaver at palladion.com
Mon Nov 16 05:27:29 CET 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 3:35 AM, Christian Heimes <lists at cheimes.de> wrote:
>> Do we really want to change distutils to solve a problem of a third
>> party packaging system when the problem was created by the very same
>> third party in the first place? In other words: Should you spend your
>> precious development time with fixing a problem that isn't our fault?
>> The decision to split the header files into a separate package, that
>> isn't installed by default, has already created tons of bad user
>> experience in the past. Do you want to endorse the split even further?
> I didn't know the split story went like this. I took it like the
> "natural" split everyone
> agreed on, and I saw this distutils <-> Makefile link like something to fix.
> So, it sounds like a bad idea now :)
Parsing the Makefile at runtime seems like an insane choice anyway to
me: +1 for your new module having constants generated at ./configure time.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Python-Dev