[Python-Dev] Two small PEP ideas

[Barry Warsaw]

On Apr 28, 2010, at 09:22 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:

>On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 23:55, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I believe the more important part of Barry's suggested change here is
>> requiring a link to the archived message (usually from python-dev) where
>> the PEP was accepted (be it directly by you as BDFL, or by consensus
>> from a "sufficient" number of core developers). This will likely also
>> help with reminding people to announce on python-dev when PEPs are
>> accepted by consensus (or by you) somewhere like PyCon or a sprint.
>
>Though maybe it should be called Conclusion instead of Accepted and
>used for Rejected PEPs, as well?

Good point.  What do you think about 'Resolution'?

As to Guido's point about the decision making process, Nick's right.  I just
want to make sure we can capture the resolution in the PEP, be it by BDFL
pronouncement or "hey, silence is acceptance" email.

Cheers,
-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100430/9bcc6b92/attachment.pgp>