[Python-Dev] 'hasattr' is broken by design
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Tue Aug 24 00:39:37 CEST 2010
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:
> 2010/8/23 Yury Selivanov <yselivanov at gmail.com>:
>> So, the proposed magic method is not intended to change the protocol,
>> but to complement and enhance it.
>
> But it still raises the potential to break the relationship between
> hasattr and getattr.
>
> I think this should require a PEP.
Definitely needs a PEP, and will require some solid use cases to
explain why allowing optimisation of hasattr() is the right way to go.
Complexity isn't free, and I doubt the gains here will justify the
costs, but that's one of the things the PEP process is intended to
figure out.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list