[Python-Dev] setUpClass and setUpModule in unittest
exarkun at twistedmatrix.com
exarkun at twistedmatrix.com
Thu Feb 11 16:25:40 CET 2010
On 10 Feb, 02:47 pm, olemis at gmail.com wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:15 PM, <exarkun at twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>For what it's worth, we just finished *removing* support for
>>setUpClass and
>>tearDownClass from Trial.
>
>Ok ... but why ? Are they considered dangerous for modern societies ?
Several reasons:
- Over the many years the feature was available, we never found anyone
actually benefiting significantly from it. It was mostly used where
setUp/tearDown would have worked just as well.
- There are many confusing corner cases related to ordering and error
handling (particularly in the face of inheritance). Different users
invariably have different expectations about how these things work, and
there's no way to satisfy them all. One might say that this could apply
to any feature, but...
- People are exploring other solutions (such as testresources) which
may provide better functionality more simply and don't need support deep
in the loader/runner/reporter implementations.
Jean-Paul
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list