[Python-Dev] PEP 385 progress report

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Feb 13 03:23:31 CET 2010

Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2010/2/12 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>:
>> Brett Cannon wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:17, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>>> I vote on giving up the 2to3 sandbox.
>> One other point - is there a Python 2.6 backwards compatibility
>> restriction on 2to3 at the moment? If there isn't, should there be?
> I try to keep it compatible with 2.6, since we have to backport changes.

With 2.7 just around the corner, it should probably be listed in PEP 291
on that basis.

Of course, PEP 291 could do with a list of 2.5 and 2.6 specific features


Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list