[Python-Dev] PEP 386 and PEP 345

Tarek Ziadé ziade.tarek at gmail.com
Wed Jan 6 01:08:34 CET 2010


I think we've reached a consensus on those two PEPs.

Although, there's one last point that was forgotten in the discussions
: I've introduced "rc" in the pre-releases markers, so PEP 386 is
compatible with Python's own version scheme.  "rc" comes right after
"c" in the sorting. It's slightly redundant with the "c" marker but I
don't think this really matters as long as consumers know how to order
them (a < b < c < rc). I have also stated that "c" is the preferred
marker for third party projects, from PEP 386 point of view.

Is there anything else I can do to make those two PEPs accepted ?


Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list