[Python-Dev] [PEP 3148] futures - execute computations asynchronously

Jesse Noller jnoller at gmail.com
Fri Mar 5 22:42:51 CET 2010


On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Tres Seaver <tseaver at palladion.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jesse Noller wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Daniel Stutzbach
>> <daniel at stutzbachenterprises.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Brian Quinlan <brian at sweetapp.com> wrote:
>>>> import futures
>>> +1 on the idea, -1 on the name.  It's too similar to "from __future__ import
>>> ...".
>>
>> Futures is a common term for this, and implemented named this in other
>> languages. I don't think we should be adopting things that are common,
>> and found elsewhere and then renaming them.
>
> - -1 to the name from me as well:  it isn't "scoped" properly to make it
> clear what the module is about.  If they were inside a pacakge named
> 'concurrency' or some such (as hinted by Jesse Noller, I think), the
> clash would go away.

If people agree with this; do you feel the proposal of said namespace
should be a separate PEP, or piggy back on this? I don't want to piggy
back on Brian's hard work.

Jesse


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list