[Python-Dev] containment checking
v+python at g.nevcal.com
Sat Mar 20 03:20:54 CET 2010
On 3/19/2010 5:20 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
> On 20/03/2010 00:19, Glenn Linderman wrote:
>> On 3/19/2010 5:18 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
>>>>>> will probably get you buggy results, somehow or another. That's what
>>>>>> > design, code reviews, and testing are for.
>>>>> We'll have to "agree to disagree" then. If you want error
>>>>> silencing by default,
>>>>> Python is not the language you are looking for.
>>>> We can agree to disagree, if you like. But taken to the limit, the
>>>> Zen you quoted would prevent the try except clause from being used.
>>> No, that is what "unless explicitly silenced" means - you are
>>> proposing to silence them *without* an explicit try except clause.
>> Who, me? The containment checking code would contain the try/except,
>> I was proposing.
> Explicit by the programmer. That is what explicit means... Caught and
> silenced for you by Python is implicit.
Should I really believe that there are no try/except clauses in the
Python source code (nor their C equivalent, if (errno == blahblahblah)
I mean, I haven't read very much of the source code... but that
statement makes me want to download and grep...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-Dev