[Python-Dev] Dead modules

Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Sun May 23 12:51:55 CEST 2010


On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:43:57 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan at ochtman.nl> wrote:
> 
> In general, this reminds me of the ipaddr discussions. I read through
> the thread from March real quick to see if there was reasoning there
> why this package should be an exception from the "normal" standards
> track (that is, ripen on PyPI, then moving it in the stdlib when it's
> mature -- where "mature" is another word for dead, really).

I disagree that a stdlib module is a dead module. It is perfectly
possible to augment the API with new functionality without breaking
compatibility. You can also deprecate old APIs if you want.

Regards

Antoine.




More information about the Python-Dev mailing list