[Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Thu May 27 03:46:07 CEST 2010
On 27/05/10 00:31, Brian Quinlan wrote:
> You have two semantic choices here:
> 1. let the interpreter exit with the future still running
> 2. wait until the future finishes and then exit
I'd go for (1). I don't think it's unreasonable to
expect a program that wants all its tasks to finish
to explicitly wait for that to happen.
Also, automatically doing (2) would seem to make it
difficult for a program to bail out if something
unexpected happens. It would have to explicitly
shut down the thread pool instead of just letting
an exception propagate.
--
Greg
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list