[Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Thu May 27 04:29:28 CEST 2010
On 27/05/10 01:48, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I would say it is precisely that extra configurability which separates
> the executor pools in the PEP implementation from more flexible general
> purpose pools.
Wouldn't this be better addressed by adding the relevant
options to the futures pools, rather than adding another
module that provides almost exactly the same thing with
different options?
--
Greg
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list