[Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

[Greg Ewing]

On 27/05/10 01:48, Nick Coghlan wrote:

> I would say it is precisely that extra configurability which separates
> the executor pools in the PEP implementation from more flexible general
> purpose pools.

Wouldn't this be better addressed by adding the relevant
options to the futures pools, rather than adding another
module that provides almost exactly the same thing with
different options?

-- 
Greg