[Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Fri May 28 01:18:47 CEST 2010
Brian Quinlan wrote:
> I think that the "Executor" suffix is a good indicator of the interface
> being provided.
It's not usually considered necessary for the name of a
type to indicate its interface. We don't have 'listsequence'
and 'dictmapping' for example.
I think what bothers me most about these names is their
longwindedness. Two parts to a name is okay, but three or
more starts to sound pedantic. And for me, "Pool" is a
more important piece of information than "Executor".
The fact that it manages a pool is the main reason I'd
use such a module rather than just spawning a thread myself
for each task.
--
Greg
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list