[Python-Dev] Mercurial Schedule

Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Fri Nov 19 19:52:03 CET 2010


On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 05:50, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote:
>> Am 19.11.2010 03:23, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
>>> 2010/11/18 Jesus Cea <jcea at jcea.es>:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> On 18/11/10 18:32, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>>>> In general, I'm *also* concerned about the lack of volunteers that
>>>>> are interested in working on the infrastructure. I wish some of the
>>>>> people who stated that they can't wait for the migration to happen
>>>>> would work on solving some of the remaining problems.
>>>>
>>>> Do we have a exhaustive list of mercurial "to do" things?.
>>>
>>> http://hg.python.org/pymigr/file/1576eb34ec9f/tasks.txt
>>
>> Uh, that's the list of things to do *at* the migration.  The todo list is
>>
>> http://hg.python.org/pymigr/file/1576eb34ec9f/todo.txt
>
> That kind of link is the sort of thing that should really be in the
> PEP... (along with the info about where to find the hooks repository,
> specific URLs for at least 3.x, 3.1 and 2.7, pointers to a draft FAQ
> to replace the current SVN focused FAQ, etc)

I am spending my PSF grant time in January rewriting python.org/dev
practically from scratch. Any needed updates to take Mercurial in
account will happen no later than then.

-Brett

>
> Target dates for the following specific activities would also be useful:
> - date a "final draft" of converted repository will be made available
> to Martin and Ronald to dry run creation of Windows and Mac OS X
> installers
> - date SVN will go read only
> - date Hg will be available for write access (it should be frozen for
> a while, to give the folks doing the conversion a chance to make sure
> buildbot is back up and run, commit emails are working properly, etc)
>
> So as long as we acknowledge that any migration problems may mean
> additional beta releases of 3.2 to iron things out, I don't see a
> problem with releasing beta 1 as planned to close the door on any
> *other* new features, and giving the Hg migration a clear run at the
> source repository before we start working seriously on dealing with
> bug reports (either existing ones, or those from the first beta).
>
> Cheers,
> Nick.
>
> --
> Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org
>


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list