[Python-Dev] new buffer in python2.7
Kristján Valur Jónsson
kristjan at ccpgames.com
Wed Oct 27 16:33:32 CEST 2010
Not cheap enough. There is no reason why creating another memoryview shouldn't be as cheap as creating a string slice.
I'm investigating why.
K
-----Original Message-----
From: python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames.com at python.org [mailto:python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames.com at python.org] On Behalf Of Antoine Pitrou
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 20:15
To: python-dev at python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] new buffer in python2.7
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:00:10 +0800
Kristján Valur Jónsson <kristjan at ccpgames.com<mailto:kristjan at ccpgames.com>> wrote:
> Calling getbuffer on a bytearray or a bytes object should be really
> cheap, so I still don't accept this as a matter of fact situation.
It *is* cheap. It's just that copying a short slice is dirt cheap as well.
Of course, it you manipulate 1 KB slices or longer, it's different.
Regards
Antoine.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev at python.org<mailto:Python-Dev at python.org>
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/kristjan%40ccpgames.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20101027/5ba6693b/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list