[Python-Dev] Behaviour of max() and min() with equal keys
hrvoje.niksic at avl.com
Wed Sep 8 10:48:34 CEST 2010
On 09/07/2010 11:40 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
> Decimal may actually have this backwards. The idea would be that
> min(*lst) == sorted(lst), and max(*lst) == sorted(lst)[-1].
Here you mean "is" rather than "==", right? The relations you spelled
are guaranteed regardless of stability.
(This doesn't apply to Decimal.max and Decimal.min, which return new
More information about the Python-Dev