tjreedy at udel.edu
Thu Sep 23 01:18:35 CEST 2010
On 9/22/2010 6:47 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> There was a whole python-dev thread some time (weeks? months?) ago where
> several of us already tried to suggest more fruitful ways of
> contributing, suggestions which weren't received very welcomingly AFAIR.
There were two types of criticisms and suggestions, somewhat
contradictory. The first type was something like 'Your tracker work is
fine, but your pydev post berating others for not doing the same thing
as you is not. Relax, do what you think is worthwhile, and let others
decide what they will do." When I reiterated that in private email, he
agreed with me and as far as I know he changed his behavior.
The second type, which apparently included your response, began "Your
tracker work is not all good. Change what your are doing ...". If the
continuing disagreement and upset with his tracker (versus posting)
behavior, to the point of possibly canceling admin privileges, had been
brought up for instance on the committers list, I would have suggested
to him that the low-hanging fruit had been picked (or discarded) and
that a more careful approach was needed for the future. Would that have
had any effect? I do not know.
> Now I understand that opinions over this may vary and involve multiple
> factors, but I would suggest that at least a bit of mentoring is needed
> if we want to give privileges early on.
> (and the amount of mentoring needed can vary wildly from one person to
Mentoring would be easier if there were clearer and more complete
written guidelines. I was under the impression that this was being
worked on. It would also be easier if it were clearer who is/are the
deputed tracker authority/ies. Not everyone has the same idea about how
to handle the various fields and processes. Who decides in cases of
Terry Jan Reedy
More information about the Python-Dev