tjreedy at udel.edu
Sun Sep 26 20:25:26 CEST 2010
On 9/26/2010 7:43 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Yep, hence why I think the basic "bug, feature, other" split may be a
> good way to go. It's a quick and easy decision most of the time
> (including a clear choice for "I don't know if this is a bug or not"),
> and makes a meaningful procedural distinction (bugs are usually
> backported, new features are not, and other changes may be backported
> depending on the details).
+1 on 3 categories. The categories other than the main two are used so
seldom as to make the differentiation pretty useless.
Terry Jan Reedy
More information about the Python-Dev