[Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Sorry for following up to myself, but this typo might be very
confusing:

Stephen J. Turnbull writes:
 > Barry Warsaw writes:
 > 
 >  > You can have "co-located" branches[1] which essentially switch
 >  > in-place, so if a branch is changing some .c files, you won't have
 >  > to rebuild the whole world just to try out a patch.
 > 
 > In Mercurial these are called "named branches", and they are
 > repo-local (by which I mean they must be part of the DAG).  Named
 > branches used to have some inconvenient aspects relevant to standalone

s/relevant/relative/

 > branches (they could be fairly confusing to other users if pushed
 > before being merge to mainline).
 > 
 > It's not obvious to me that Mercurial style named branches would work
 > well here ... it would take a little thought to design an appropriate
 > workflow, anyway.
 > _______________________________________________
 > Python-Dev mailing list
 > Python-Dev at python.org
 > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
 > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/stephen%40xemacs.org