[Python-Dev] Moving forward with the concurrent package
Raymond Hettinger
raymond.hettinger at gmail.com
Wed Aug 10 22:46:41 CEST 2011
On Aug 10, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Le Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:54:33 -0500,
> Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> a écrit :
>> 2011/8/10 Brian Curtin <brian.curtin at gmail.com>:
>>> Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for
>>> multiprocessing to follow suit? PEP 3148 mentions a hope to add or move
>>> things in the future
>>
>> Is there some sort of concrete proposal? The PEP just seems to mention
>> it as an idea.
>>
>> In general, -1. I think we don't need to be moving things around more
>> to little advantage.
>
> Agreed. Also, flat is better than nested. Whoever wants to populate the
> concurrent package should work on new features to be added to it, rather
> than plans to rename things around.
I concur.
Raymond
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list