[Python-Dev] PEP 393 Summer of Code Project
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Wed Aug 24 20:46:21 CEST 2011
On 8/24/2011 1:50 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> I'd like to point out that the improved compatibility is only a side
> effect, not the primary objective of the PEP.
Then why does the Rationale start with "on systems only supporting
UTF-16, users complain that non-BMP characters are not properly supported."?
A Windows user can only solve this problem by switching to *nix.
> The primary objective is the reduction in memory usage.
On average (perhaps). As I understand the PEP, for some strings, Windows
users will see a doubling of memory usage. Statistically, that doubling
is probably more likely in longer texts. Ascii-only Python code and
other limited-to-ascii text will benefit. Typical English business
documents will see no change as they often have proper non-ascii quotes
and occasional accented characters, trademark symbols, and other things.
I think you have the objectives backwards. Adding memory is a lot easier
than switching OSes.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list