[Python-Dev] Software Transactional Memory for Python
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Aug 27 14:40:35 CEST 2011
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Armin Rigo <arigo at tunes.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> About multithreading models: I recently made an observation which
> might be obvious to some, but not to me, and as far as I know not to
> most of us either. I think that it's worth being pointed out :-)
>
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pypy-dev/2011-August/008153.html
Having a context manager to say "don't release the GIL" for a bit
could actually be really nice (e.g. for implementing builtin-style
method semantics for data types written in Python).
However, two immediate questions come to mind:
1. How does the patch interact with C code that explicitly releases
the GIL? (e.g. IO commands inside a "with atomic:" block)
2. Whether or not Jython and IronPython could implement something like
that, since they're free threaded with fine-grained locks. If they
can't then I don't see how we could justify making it part of the
standard library.
Interesting idea, though :)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list