[Python-Dev] is sys.modules not meant to be replaced?
Benjamin Peterson
benjamin at python.org
Sun Jul 24 06:55:38 CEST 2011
2011/7/23 Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com>:
> The documentation[1] doesn't say, but the implementation of the imp
> module makes me wonder if sys.modules was not meant to be replaceable.
> No doubt this has to do with its tie to the interpreter's modules
> dict. I ran into this doing "sys.modules = sys.modules.copy()" to
> protect the actual sys.modules dict during some import related test
> cases. If the modules I imported were extension modules it broke.
>
> So, is sys.modules not meant to be open to re-binding?
Not any more or less than other global mutable objects. You can expect
other code to be holding on to old references.
--
Regards,
Benjamin
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list