[Python-Dev] API deprecations in Python 3, from a Python 2 perspective
Jesus Cea
jcea at jcea.es
Thu Mar 17 20:08:50 CET 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 17/03/11 16:04, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I don't want to be alarmist and I don't want to start another
> moratorium, but I do think that we need to be aware of people coming
> in "sideways" into Python 3 and missing the nice deprecations. So
> let's be conservative with deprecations in the Python 3 line for now.
I can see the motivation for this.
I would suggest to keep deprecating things in 3.x, BUT keeping the
deprecated stuff around (maybe reimplementing them using the new stuff)
until we decide is safe to axe it, instead of the regular 3.x
deprecates, 3.(x+1) cleans up.
In this way we can keep the improvements, while not leaving people just
migrating from 2.7 behind.
The problem will be to decide when to do the cleanup...
- --
Jesus Cea Avion _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/
jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
. _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQCVAwUBTYJcQplgi5GaxT1NAQIeawQAgC3kpmS8RoYoeRn6BRFKTOSEKc6edafY
NVKDZ+NAZzTeYqJcr0symc+9A+5J92fJQq2n6tz1/K2yAzS/m1dudAXK7YIb1Ldc
EwX8JB2osvCgGM5PFefhGOLZ0VrrlWnHQTEviU5GilGNHzCcbEgNj/3BPnEyCNyv
QPmlcyeN+eQ=
=xidU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list