[Python-Dev] Workflow proposal
solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed Mar 23 03:41:15 CET 2011
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:39:01 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote:
> Executive summary:
> If we're really serious about serializing the public branches, mq
> seems to be the way to go.
I really think that at this point we should continue practicing with
the current setup before deciding on refinements or changes.
> > 6. Use "hg strip" (dangerous!) to delete the local merges to 3.2 and
> > "default". Leave the original commit in "3.1" alone.
> I would suggest "hg strip --keep" which leaves the working copy
Now, "hg strip" should definitely be absent of any recommended or even
suggested workflow. It's a power user tool for the experimented
developer/admin. Not the average hg command.
By the way, whether or not mq gets used is pretty much anyone's private
decision (unless we decide that patches must get split into logical
units and mailbombed for review ala mercurial-devel, which would be a
significant departure from our development habits).
More information about the Python-Dev