[Python-Dev] sprints and pushes

Tres Seaver tseaver at palladion.com
Fri Mar 25 14:51:04 CET 2011


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/24/2011 10:51 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

> If you are going to argue
> for running some tests but not others after making changes, shouldn't
> there be a notion of relevance involved?  IMO "the" tests for modules
> with dependents should include the tests for their dependents, for
> example.  Modules that are leaves in the dependency tree presumably
> can be unit tested and leave it at that.

That was precisely my proposal:  when trying to check in changes to a
stdlib module, we required that developers ensure that the module's
tests, *and* those of its dependents, pass.  We would need to add new
testing infrastructure to support this expectation by computing (and
saving) the dependency graph of the stdlib.  I originally suggested
build time for this, but now think that it would better be built during
an intial full run of the suite.



Tres.
- -- 
===================================================================
Tres Seaver          +1 540-429-0999          tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"    http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk2MncgACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ5WWwCfZVNtfIsPZWx6o5fC08Dh+JHV
EKsAn19jQ//9TGLhMs0yCiY5zDBXNEoD
=VVCq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list