ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com
Thu Apr 26 07:31:50 CEST 2012
The proposal of adding sys.implementation has come up a couple times
over the last few years.  While the reaction has been
overwhelmingly positive, nothing has come of it. I've created a
tracker issue and a patch:
The patch adds a struct sequence that holds ("name" => "CPython",
"version" => sys.version_info). If later needs dictate more fields,
we can cross that bridge then.
Are there any objections? Considering the positive reaction and the
scope of the addition, does this need a PEP?
More information about the Python-Dev