[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #15794: Relax a test case due to the deadlock detection's
Brett Cannon
brett at python.org
Tue Aug 28 21:00:57 CEST 2012
Should there be a Misc/NEWS entry since we are in rc mode?
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:13 PM, antoine.pitrou
<python-checkins at python.org>wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/454dceb5fd56
> changeset: 78790:454dceb5fd56
> parent: 78788:06497bbdf4fe
> user: Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>
> date: Tue Aug 28 20:10:18 2012 +0200
> summary:
> Issue #15794: Relax a test case due to the deadlock detection's
> conservativeness.
>
> files:
> Lib/test/test_importlib/test_locks.py | 22 ++++++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/Lib/test/test_importlib/test_locks.py
> b/Lib/test/test_importlib/test_locks.py
> --- a/Lib/test/test_importlib/test_locks.py
> +++ b/Lib/test/test_importlib/test_locks.py
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> from importlib import _bootstrap
> +import sys
> import time
> import unittest
> import weakref
> @@ -41,6 +42,17 @@
> @unittest.skipUnless(threading, "threads needed for this test")
> class DeadlockAvoidanceTests(unittest.TestCase):
>
> + def setUp(self):
> + try:
> + self.old_switchinterval = sys.getswitchinterval()
> + sys.setswitchinterval(0.000001)
> + except AttributeError:
> + self.old_switchinterval = None
> +
> + def tearDown(self):
> + if self.old_switchinterval is not None:
> + sys.setswitchinterval(self.old_switchinterval)
> +
> def run_deadlock_avoidance_test(self, create_deadlock):
> NLOCKS = 10
> locks = [LockType(str(i)) for i in range(NLOCKS)]
> @@ -75,10 +87,12 @@
>
> def test_deadlock(self):
> results = self.run_deadlock_avoidance_test(True)
> - # One of the threads detected a potential deadlock on its second
> - # acquire() call.
> - self.assertEqual(results.count((True, False)), 1)
> - self.assertEqual(results.count((True, True)), len(results) - 1)
> + # At least one of the threads detected a potential deadlock on its
> + # second acquire() call. It may be several of them, because the
> + # deadlock avoidance mechanism is conservative.
> + nb_deadlocks = results.count((True, False))
> + self.assertGreaterEqual(nb_deadlocks, 1)
> + self.assertEqual(results.count((True, True)), len(results) -
> nb_deadlocks)
>
> def test_no_deadlock(self):
> results = self.run_deadlock_avoidance_test(False)
>
> --
> Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/cpython
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-checkins mailing list
> Python-checkins at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-checkins
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120828/f557eb62/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list