[Python-Dev] Counting collisions for the win

Carl Meyer carl at oddbird.net
Fri Jan 20 05:54:18 CET 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Victor,

On 01/19/2012 05:48 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
[snip]
> Using a randomized hash may
> also break (indirectly) real applications because the application
> output is also somehow "randomized". For example, in the Django test
> suite, the HTML output is different at each run. Web browsers may
> render the web page differently, or crash, or ... I don't think that
> Django would like to sort attributes of each HTML tag, just because we
> wanted to fix a vulnerability.

I'm a Django core developer, and if it is true that our test-suite has a
dictionary-ordering dependency that is expressed via HTML attribute
ordering, I consider that a bug and would like to fix it. I'd be
grateful for, not resentful of, a change in CPython that revealed the
bug and prompted us to fix it. (I presume that it is true, as it sounds
like you experienced it directly; I don't have time to play around at
the moment, but I'm surprised we haven't seen bug reports about it from
users of 64-bit Pythons long ago). I can't speak for the core team, but
I doubt there would be much disagreement on this point: ideally Django
would run equally well on any implementation of Python, and as far as I
know none of the alternative implementations guarantee hash or
dict-ordering compatibility with CPython.

I don't have the expertise to speak otherwise to the alternatives for
fixing the collisions vulnerability, but I don't believe it's accurate
to presume that Django would not want to fix a dict-ordering dependency,
and use that as a justification for one approach over another.

Carl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk8Y83oACgkQ8W4rlRKtE2cNawCg5q/p1+OOKFYDymDJGoClBBlg
WNAAn3xevD+0CqAQ+mFNHCBhtLgw8IYv
=HDOh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list