[Python-Dev] PEP 408 -- Standard library __preview__ package
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Jan 28 07:37:57 CET 2012
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
> Would it be acceptable then for a distro to disable __preview__ or empty it
> The thinking goes like this: if you would normally use an __preview__ module
> because you can't get approval to download some random package from PyPI, well
> then your distro probably could or should provide it, so get it from them. In
> fact, if the number of __preview__ modules is kept low, *and* PyPI equivalents
> were a requirement, then a distro vendor could just ensure those PyPI versions
> are available as distro packages outside of the __preview__ stdlib namespace
> (i.e. in their normal third-party namespace). Then folks developing on that
> platform could just use the distro package and ignore __preview__.
> If that's acceptable, then maybe it should be explicitly so in the PEP.
I think that's an excellent idea - in that case, the distro vendor is
taking over the due diligence responsibilities, which are the main
point of __preview__.
Similarly, sumo distributions like ActiveState or Python(x, y) could
choose to add the PyPI version.
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Python-Dev