[Python-Dev] Import semantics?
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Sat Jun 9 00:41:06 CEST 2012
Dan Stromberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Dan Stromberg wrote:
>> Did the import semantics change in cpython 3.3a4?
>>
>> I used to be able to import treap.py even though I had a treap
>> directory in my cwd. With 3.3a4, I have to rename the treap
>> directory to see treap.py.
>
> Check out PEP 420 -- Implicit Namespace Packages
> [http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0420/]
>
>
> Am I misinterpreting this? It seems like according to the PEP, I should
> have still been able to import treap.py despite having a treap/. But I
> couldn't; I had to rename treap/ to treap-dir/ first.
>
> During import processing, the import machinery will continue to iterate
> over each directory in the parent path as it does in Python 3.2. While
> looking for a module or package named "foo", for each directory in the
> parent path:
>
> * If <directory>/foo/__init__.py is found, a regular package is
> imported and returned.
> * If not, but <directory>/foo.{py,pyc,so,pyd} is found, a module
> is imported and returned. The exact list of extension varies
> by platform and whether the -O flag is specified. The list
> here is representative.
> * If not, but <directory>/foo is found and is a directory, it is
> recorded and the scan continues with the next directory in the
> parent path.
> * Otherwise the scan continues with the next directory in the
> parent path.
I do not understand PEP 420 well enough to say if this is intentional or
a bug -- thoughts?
~Ethan~
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list