[Python-Dev] PEP 362: 4th edition
Alexandre Zani
alexandre.zani at gmail.com
Fri Jun 15 22:17:24 CEST 2012
-1 implemented
It appears to target the problem of platform-dependent parameters.
However as was discussed previously, much more common than a parameter
simply not being supported on a platform is a parameter supporting
different values on different platforms. As such, I think that it
solves too small a sub-set of the problem that it attacks to be
useful. Raising exceptions solves the problem.
Furthermore, whether a parameter is implemented or not is not properly
a part of the callable's signature. It's a part of the function's
internals.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote:
> On 06/15/2012 12:50 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote:
>
> Open questions:
>
> 1. Should we keep 'Parameter.implemented' or not. *Please vote*
>
>
> +1 to keeping Parameter.implemented.
>
> Let's get this over with,
>
>
> /arry
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/alexandre.zani%40gmail.com
>
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list