[Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #10278: Add an optional strict argument to time.steady(), False by default

[Victor Stinner]

>>> This is not clear to me.  Why wouldn't it raise OSError on error even with
>>> strict=False?  Please clarify which exception is raised in which case.
>>
>> It seems clear to me. It doesn't raise exceptions when strict=False because
>> it falls back to a non-monotonic clock. If strict is True and a non-monotonic
>> clock is not available it raises OSError or NotImplementedError.
>
> So errors are ignored when strict is false?

Said differently: time.steady(strict=True) is always monotonic (*),
whereas time.steady() may or may not be monotonic, depending on what
is avaiable.

time.steady() is a best-effort steady clock.

(*) time.steady(strict=True) relies on the OS monotonic clock. If the
OS provides a "not really monotonic" clock, Python cannot do better.
For example, clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) speed can be adjusted by
NTP on Linux. Python tries to use clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW)
which doesn't have this issue.

Victor